<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 32 in 32: Who Will The Lions Draft?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html</link>
	<description>Updated Mock Drafts, Prospect Rankings, Scouting Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dwash		</title>
		<link>http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html#comment-215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dwash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mockdrafthq.com/blog/?p=1190#comment-215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html#comment-214&quot;&gt;Randy&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the comment.  Maybe if not Clayborn, then a guard I guess if it is that dire a need? I doubt Amakumara will be there.  Pouncey is anywhere from a 15th-20th range player to the late 2nd round depending who you ask, he could possibly be had later.  I don&#039;t project trades as people who do that tend to be unrealistic and assume that every team has an ideal trading partner lined up, thanks for the comment!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html#comment-214">Randy</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  Maybe if not Clayborn, then a guard I guess if it is that dire a need? I doubt Amakumara will be there.  Pouncey is anywhere from a 15th-20th range player to the late 2nd round depending who you ask, he could possibly be had later.  I don&#8217;t project trades as people who do that tend to be unrealistic and assume that every team has an ideal trading partner lined up, thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy		</title>
		<link>http://www.mockdrafthq.com/2011/03/32-in-32-who-will-the-lions-draft.html#comment-214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mockdrafthq.com/blog/?p=1190#comment-214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t like the Clayborn choice at all.  My preference is (provided the players as you indicated above are gone)...

1. Amukamara
2. Pouncey (we were ranked 8th running off tackle, 29th between the tackles)
3. Trade down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the Clayborn choice at all.  My preference is (provided the players as you indicated above are gone)&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Amukamara<br />
2. Pouncey (we were ranked 8th running off tackle, 29th between the tackles)<br />
3. Trade down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
